Pro & Con #8: Is the Supreme Court Right to See Money as Speech?
- Andrew Hawkins
- Apr 10, 2020
- 1 min read

In this hypothetical example, Andy
McFearless, an incumbent Republican, is running for president in the 2020
presidential election. McFearless was getting big money from supporters. The
supporters were giving him large sums of money greater than $25,000 dollars. Due
to these big checks from big donors, McFearless won the election by a
landslide. However, Mandy SkyRaider, the frontrunner of the Democratic Party,
is also running for president in the 2020 presidential election. SkyRaider does
not have supporters giving her large sums of money greater than $25,000
dollars. SkyRaider feels like the election is rigged because she doesn’t have
the same supporters as her competitor, McFearless, does. Due to theses big
checks from big donors to McFearless and hardly any support for SkyRaider,
McFearless won the election by a landslide.
This fictional example poses the question, “Is the Supreme Court right to see money as speech because limiting money will provide…
View original post 1,087 more words
Recent Posts
See AllIntroduction Let's go on the next Altcoin adventure and analyze Ethereum and how it challenges other cryptocurrency ecosystems....
Introduction: Altcoins are the new way of cryptocurrency. The main altcoins featured on various cryptocurrency fintech applications are...
In the diverse landscape of cryptocurrencies, stablecoins stand out as one of the safest options available in the market. Essentially,...
Comments